Résumé
Introduction: Surgical treatment of rectal cancer depends on clinical stage, size and location of primary tumor. A sphincter preserving technique such as low anterior resection (LAR) is the preferred method if negative distal margin can be achieved. If an adequate distal margin cannot be obtained, an abdominoperineal resection (APR) is required. A proctosigmoidectomy (Hartmann's procedure) is performed in patients with potentially curable obstructing rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or as a palliative treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Aim(s): The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the impact of COVID 19 pandemic on the number and type of surgeries performed for the treatment of rectal cancer in UHC Zagreb, Department of Surgery. Material(s) and Method(s): Collected data were extracted from medical records of the patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Surgery from 1st of January 2016 to 31st of December 2022 with prior Ethics Committee approval. Total of 688 patients were included. Retrospective analysis of number and type of surgery was done consecutively by years for the period of interest. Result(s): In 2016 total of 75 patients underwent elective surgery for rectal cancer. LAR was performed in 64% (N=48) of patients, Hartmann's procedure in 20% (N=15), and APR in 16% (N=12). In 2017, 94 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 64% (N=60), Hartmann's procedure 17% (N=16), and APR 19% (N=18). In 2018, 115 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 69% (N=79), Hartmann's procedure 10% (N=12), and APR 21% (N=24). In 2019, 80 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 67% (N=54), Hartmann's procedure 9% (N=80), and APR 24%. In 2020, 78 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 59% (N=46), Hartmann's procedure 14% (N=11), and APR 27% (N=21). In 2021, 124 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 66% (N=82), Hartmann's procedure 14% (N=17), and APR 20% (N=25). In 2022, 122 surgeries were performed. LAR accounted for 64% (N=78), Hartmann's procedure 15% (N=18), and APR 21% (N=26). Conclusion(s): Our results show steady growth in numbers of performed surgeries in the years prior to the pandemic, with exception of the year 2019 when our department underwent organizational changes. In 2020, significant decrease in number of surgeries was observed as a result of restrictive epidemiological measures established to reduce the spread of COVID 19 infection. COVID 19 pandemic measures also resulted in delayed diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer which is indirectly shown through the increasing share of Hartmann's procedure. In the years following the relaxation of measures, significant increase in number of performed surgeries that exceeded all the pre-pandemic years was recorded. Constant elevated share of Hartmann's procedure was noted as possible consequence of post COVID delay in diagnosis and confirmation of rectal cancer in more advanced stages of disease.
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: In 2020. the COVID-19 pandemic presented an additional source of stress and anxiety not just to the general population but also to medical students who are, even under normal circumstances, constantly under pressure due to demanding student duties. In addition, they experienced a series of devastating earthquakes in and around the Zagreb region which altogether could have had compromised their psychological well-being. The aim of this review was to evaluate the psychological effects of these two natural disasters on the mental health of Croatian medical students. RESULTS: According to standardized questionnaires for depression and anxiety evaluation, 75.3% of students were anxious and 65.2% were depressive during the "double crisis". No significant difference of these two outcomes was observed regarding genders, but it was found that first year students had a significantly higher anxiety score than older ones. CONCLUSION: In such stressful situations, we should emphasize the importance of mental health not just of healthcare workers, but also of medical students in order to prevent serious psychological consequences and to alleviate the negative effects on students' motivation and their educational process.
Résumé
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent oncological diseases globally, taking 3rd place in incidence in the general population. High in mortality, it is also a form of cancer whose outcome is highly dependable on its stage at diagnosis. Therefore, many countries have adopted a more or less successful screening process to ensure early diagnosis and, in turn, higher survival rates and better results overall. The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the established medical routines worldwide, with massively postponing diagnostic procedures and elective surgeries. This study aims to measure the effect the pandemic has had on colorectal cancer treatment in our Institution. Variables such as deferral time from diagnosis to commencement of treatment, lapse of time between different phases of the treatment process, time of presentation (elective versus emergent surgery), the physical status of the patient at the time of surgery (ASA classification) and metastatic index (positive lymph node ratio), were taken into account. We juxtaposed data from patients treated at the Surgical Department of Clinical Hospital Center in Zagreb in 2019 and 2020, the latter being heavily affected by the pandemic. In 2019 and 2020, 347 and 314 patients, respectively, with C18-C20 diagnoses (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems ICD-10), have been treated at our Hospital. With exclusion criteria applied, the patient count falls to 173 for 2019 and 157 for 2020. These numbers include operated cases with or without an anastomosis formation and with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy applied. From the analysis we excluded patients with recurrent colorectal tumors, synchronous and metachronous tumors, and patients treated palliatively. Furthermore, colorectal adenomas were also excluded from the study. Our data shows significant difference between observed variables in the two patient groups, attributed to the COVID- 19 pandemic. Since there is still no reliable way to predict the duration of this global health crisis, it is imperative to implement strategies to lessen the damaging effect the pandemic has had on favourable oncosurgical treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer patients.